This week several citizen letters were submitted to the LO Review regrading the Councils decision not to re appoint a planning commissioner. Its interesting as they are both for and against the decision. However most are saying now that the recent community survey shows that most residents are quite happy with the new direction in LO and that many believe the decision was more than justified.
The original article in the Review can be found here: Planning Commissioner Appointments. Comments include those from COLA board members who publicly identify themselves by name rather than make anonymous comments on positions.
A variety of opinions on the issue can be found in the Readers Letters section this week. Some of the
notable comments on citizens views include the following:
"sued his city and the people that he
was assigned to represent, and cost our community in excess of $1 million. And,
he lost his lawsuit. That $1 million could have been better used for our
schools!"
"Additionally, while functioning in an official
appointed capacity, elected to initiate a lawsuit against the very
city he represents. Given what appears to be a conflict of interest, it would
have been more appropriate for ..... to have resigned from his official
position long ago."
"Of course, there are citizens who are
disappointed in the actions of our local officials, and the point of a survey
is to gauge that level of dissatisfaction. Today, that feeling of
dissatisfaction sits with the few and not the many. A majority of Lake Oswego
residents have a very favorable opinion of their city, and on a scale of one to
10, they rate the city an 8.6 as a place to live."
Its an interesitng debate given the results of the latest community survey. Please notify all members, contacts, and friends.